Comments on: Bugsquashing and paint attributes http://dev.compiz-fusion.org/~kristian/2007/01/15/bugsquashing-and-paint-attributes/ Just another Dev.compiz-fusion.org weblog Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:40:05 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 By: Euskal http://dev.compiz-fusion.org/~kristian/2007/01/15/bugsquashing-and-paint-attributes/#comment-105 Euskal Sun, 28 Jan 2007 20:02:05 +0000 http://dev.compiz-fusion.org/~kristian/2007/01/15/bugsquashing-and-paint-attributes/#comment-105 hehe ff is the only browser I know that has a autoscrolling image hope moz-devs resolve the fuzzy redraws on aiglx before 3.0.0 9_9 hehe ff is the only browser I know that has a autoscrolling image
hope moz-devs resolve the fuzzy redraws on aiglx before 3.0.0 9_9

]]> By: kristian http://dev.compiz-fusion.org/~kristian/2007/01/15/bugsquashing-and-paint-attributes/#comment-104 kristian Sun, 28 Jan 2007 13:44:26 +0000 http://dev.compiz-fusion.org/~kristian/2007/01/15/bugsquashing-and-paint-attributes/#comment-104 Nah, it's more the design of the app. In my experience, ff kinda likes to do it's own thing, seems like it wants to be the only app to run and that the wm and de should revolve around ff. Examples of that is the lack of proper wm_class on the menus, and some resize/maximize "tricks". Asm I don't really know, but other apps that I feel like to do their own thing is openoffice... There are a number of applications that doesn't properly follow the EWMH, just follows it enough to work under traditional setups... Nah, it’s more the design of the app. In my experience, ff kinda likes to do it’s own thing, seems like it wants to be the only app to run and that the wm and de should revolve around ff. Examples of that is the lack of proper wm_class on the menus, and some resize/maximize “tricks”.

Asm I don’t really know, but other apps that I feel like to do their own thing is openoffice… There are a number of applications that doesn’t properly follow the EWMH, just follows it enough to work under traditional setups…

]]> By: Euskal http://dev.compiz-fusion.org/~kristian/2007/01/15/bugsquashing-and-paint-attributes/#comment-103 Euskal Sun, 28 Jan 2007 10:52:36 +0000 http://dev.compiz-fusion.org/~kristian/2007/01/15/bugsquashing-and-paint-attributes/#comment-103 HI.. I ve noticed some bugs, about apps behaving weird accross Desktop enviroments. I suppose... well it is more possible that for ex. firefox, is going to behave not as expected at gnome, because epiphany is it's default browser. Same, for expample goes for Asm, (cozz it uses tcl y tk) , it won't have a perfect interaction neither in Kde or gnome .. in other words there is no Gui/Desktop integration, if the user prefers other apps rather than defaults. ¿What's you opinion about this? HI..
I ve noticed some bugs, about apps behaving weird accross Desktop enviroments.

I suppose… well it is more possible that for ex. firefox, is going to behave not as expected at gnome, because epiphany is it’s default browser.
Same, for expample goes for Asm, (cozz it uses tcl y tk) , it won’t have a perfect interaction neither in Kde or gnome ..
in other words there is no Gui/Desktop integration, if the user prefers other apps rather than defaults.

¿What’s you opinion about this?

]]> By: Ago http://dev.compiz-fusion.org/~kristian/2007/01/15/bugsquashing-and-paint-attributes/#comment-102 Ago Mon, 15 Jan 2007 07:28:04 +0000 http://dev.compiz-fusion.org/~kristian/2007/01/15/bugsquashing-and-paint-attributes/#comment-102 Well, yes, 0.1.5 was definitively coming too fast. I'm sure we will all help you to do the best release possible. Hopefully, we won't be late for 0.2.0 ;) Well, yes, 0.1.5 was definitively coming too fast.
I’m sure we will all help you to do the best release possible.

Hopefully, we won’t be late for 0.2.0 ;)

]]>