<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for import blog</title>
	<link>http://dev.compiz-fusion.org/~marex</link>
	<description>Messages straight from /dev/urandom</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 19:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Ubuntu Icon Theme by Vadim P.</title>
		<link>http://dev.compiz-fusion.org/~marex/2008/07/11/ubuntu-icon-theme/#comment-212</link>
		<dc:creator>Vadim P.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 12:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dev.compiz-fusion.org/~marex/2008/07/11/ubuntu-icon-theme/#comment-212</guid>
		<description>Could the folders get a lil' ubuntu logo?

This is the current icon theme I'm using: http://img530.imageshack.us/img530/7164/screenshot1kr9.png

I don't know the name of it, but I like the branding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could the folders get a lil&#8217; ubuntu logo?</p>
<p>This is the current icon theme I&#8217;m using: <a href="http://img530.imageshack.us/img530/7164/screenshot1kr9.png" rel="nofollow">http://img530.imageshack.us/img530/7164/screenshot1kr9.png</a></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know the name of it, but I like the branding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ubuntu Icon Theme by amano</title>
		<link>http://dev.compiz-fusion.org/~marex/2008/07/11/ubuntu-icon-theme/#comment-210</link>
		<dc:creator>amano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 10:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dev.compiz-fusion.org/~marex/2008/07/11/ubuntu-icon-theme/#comment-210</guid>
		<description>Yes. Definitely ways better than the current Ubuntu icons. I definitely love the trash icon. The current (8.04) one is really ugly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes. Definitely ways better than the current Ubuntu icons. I definitely love the trash icon. The current (8.04) one is really ugly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ubuntu Icon Theme by peder</title>
		<link>http://dev.compiz-fusion.org/~marex/2008/07/11/ubuntu-icon-theme/#comment-209</link>
		<dc:creator>peder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 23:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dev.compiz-fusion.org/~marex/2008/07/11/ubuntu-icon-theme/#comment-209</guid>
		<description>Suggestions? Yes, make it the default!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Suggestions? Yes, make it the default!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on There you go&#8230; by Vadim P.</title>
		<link>http://dev.compiz-fusion.org/~marex/2008/05/03/there-you-go-2/#comment-127</link>
		<dc:creator>Vadim P.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 16:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dev.compiz-fusion.org/~marex/2008/05/03/there-you-go-2/#comment-127</guid>
		<description>Correction, radeon, nor radepi.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correction, radeon, nor radepi.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on There you go&#8230; by Vadim P.</title>
		<link>http://dev.compiz-fusion.org/~marex/2008/05/03/there-you-go-2/#comment-126</link>
		<dc:creator>Vadim P.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 16:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dev.compiz-fusion.org/~marex/2008/05/03/there-you-go-2/#comment-126</guid>
		<description>Medium is still too skewed for very, very, very low-end hardware. I mean my radepi 7500 card (32mb vram) does "Advanced" fine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Medium is still too skewed for very, very, very low-end hardware. I mean my radepi 7500 card (32mb vram) does &#8220;Advanced&#8221; fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on There you go&#8230; by Corey</title>
		<link>http://dev.compiz-fusion.org/~marex/2008/05/03/there-you-go-2/#comment-120</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 23:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dev.compiz-fusion.org/~marex/2008/05/03/there-you-go-2/#comment-120</guid>
		<description>I think dodge is pleasing and simplistic enough to be included on Advanced.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think dodge is pleasing and simplistic enough to be included on Advanced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on There you go&#8230; by gianpa</title>
		<link>http://dev.compiz-fusion.org/~marex/2008/05/03/there-you-go-2/#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator>gianpa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 08:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dev.compiz-fusion.org/~marex/2008/05/03/there-you-go-2/#comment-114</guid>
		<description>I think beam up and burn effects are too much gpu consuming even for an ultimate configuration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think beam up and burn effects are too much gpu consuming even for an ultimate configuration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Profiles and other random thoughts&#8230; by Kevin L.</title>
		<link>http://dev.compiz-fusion.org/~marex/2008/05/01/profiles-and-other-random-thoughts/#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin L.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 21:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dev.compiz-fusion.org/~marex/2008/05/01/profiles-and-other-random-thoughts/#comment-94</guid>
		<description>My only suggestion is to include Switcher with the minimal profile. Having an Alt+Tab window switcher is something most people have come to expect in their DE. Some of the middle-ranged profiles should also use Stretch for resizing, as "Normal" tends to be quite C/GPU intensive. (I use Stretch on all of my machines because I find rectangle to be unnatural)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My only suggestion is to include Switcher with the minimal profile. Having an Alt+Tab window switcher is something most people have come to expect in their DE. Some of the middle-ranged profiles should also use Stretch for resizing, as &#8220;Normal&#8221; tends to be quite C/GPU intensive. (I use Stretch on all of my machines because I find rectangle to be unnatural)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Profiles and other random thoughts&#8230; by cornelius</title>
		<link>http://dev.compiz-fusion.org/~marex/2008/05/01/profiles-and-other-random-thoughts/#comment-88</link>
		<dc:creator>cornelius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 00:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dev.compiz-fusion.org/~marex/2008/05/01/profiles-and-other-random-thoughts/#comment-88</guid>
		<description>Are you considering adding a selector for Focus animation as well? It would be a useful addition.

- For minimize: Zoom with Minimal (please don't use Fade at all with minimize since it doesn't have any visual cues for where the window goes to), maybe also Zoom with Medium, and Sidekick for Advanced.

- For focus (when a selector is implemented): None with Minimal, Fade with Medium/Advanced, and Dodge with Ultimate.

- I don't recommend Glide 1 for both open and close. You could use Glide 1 for open and Glide 2 for close (I guess that was one of the profiles in Ubuntu).

- You could add wobbly to Advanced.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you considering adding a selector for Focus animation as well? It would be a useful addition.</p>
<p>- For minimize: Zoom with Minimal (please don&#8217;t use Fade at all with minimize since it doesn&#8217;t have any visual cues for where the window goes to), maybe also Zoom with Medium, and Sidekick for Advanced.</p>
<p>- For focus (when a selector is implemented): None with Minimal, Fade with Medium/Advanced, and Dodge with Ultimate.</p>
<p>- I don&#8217;t recommend Glide 1 for both open and close. You could use Glide 1 for open and Glide 2 for close (I guess that was one of the profiles in Ubuntu).</p>
<p>- You could add wobbly to Advanced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Profiles and other random thoughts&#8230; by b0le</title>
		<link>http://dev.compiz-fusion.org/~marex/2008/05/01/profiles-and-other-random-thoughts/#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>b0le</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 23:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dev.compiz-fusion.org/~marex/2008/05/01/profiles-and-other-random-thoughts/#comment-87</guid>
		<description>Also, why do you have normal mode for the resize? Rectangle/stretch look and perform much better...

Also, which focus animation will they be using?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, why do you have normal mode for the resize? Rectangle/stretch look and perform much better&#8230;</p>
<p>Also, which focus animation will they be using?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
